Apple Fumbled Its Personal Ai Debut, but the alternative was far work

Welcome to Ai decoded, Fast company‘S weekly newsletter that breaks down the most important news in the world of ai. You can sign up to receive this newsletter every week here,

A cooler-handed look at apple’s Troubled Ai Story

Apple Said at Its WWDC Developer Conference Monday That The Cuch-Hyped Apple Intelligence Features it Announced at Last Year’s Event Are Still Not Ready to Ship –and Likely Wonly Wonly Wonti 2026. Company is living with a Media Narravet That It’s Failed, Fallen Behind, Stuck in Neutral, or in Retreat on Ai.

To be clear, apple’s various operating systems alredy include ai-powered features, from photo cleanup to call screening. And the company did deliver some of the apple intelligence tools it promised last year. But there was the first-generation large language model functions like text message summarization and written assistance –unambitious by generative ai standards and not especially use.

What Got Everyone Excited At WWDC 2024 was the advanced, personalized ai features that allows that allows a user’s personal data and carry out action on their behalf. Some Examples:

• A user could say, “Hey siri, when does mom’s flight land?” And Siri -Having Access to the User’s Email, Contacts, Calendar, and Files – Would Know the Answer.
• Siri would also be able to “see” what’s on the user’s screen, so itound, for example, read an address from a text message and add it to a contact card.
• A user could tell siri to take action with an app, such as: “Siri, take the red-aye out of this photo,” or “send the email I drifted to Judy and Carmen.”

Cool Stuff, Useful, and Things Apple is uniquely positioned to offer. So what happy?

Apple Software Chief Craig Federighi and Head of Marketing Greg “Joz” joswiak offered a fulller explanation during a round of media interviews. According to them, apple had a working “version one” of a new siri architecture before announcing the personal ai features at wwdc 2024. Believed they could continue polishing the product until it performed reliable enough for a late 2024 release.

But federighi explained in an interview with Techradar That the system continued to generate too many unrealiable results in internal testing. When a year-end release became unrealistic, the team aimed for spring 2025. But by then, the system was still inconsistent. That’s when the siri team concluded it would need to create a “version two” of the new Siri Architecture –one that “Extends Accounts Across the Entre Siri Experience.” Until that reworked siri is performing reliable in-House, federighi said, the company won’t special on a public release date.

Federighi also argued that apple is trying to do sometising with personalized There’s some truth to that-comfortable if we limit the field to mobile-spoiled ai assistants, and when we were talking about doing it at Apple’s Scale. Apple may look like an ai laggard now, but it would look far worse if it shipped something that did not work or wasn’t useful.

Still, it’s not accept to say apple is the only one in the game. In May, Google Announced A Suite of Personalized Ai Features that will begin rolling out this summer. Its Gemini Assistant Can Use Personal Data in Email to Offer Summaries, Draft Messages, Provide Reminders, and Deliver Context-Aware Insights. Gemini live can analyze objects in the camera view and on the screen. And the “agent mode” in the gemini app, Built on Project Mariner, Can Perform Multi-Step Tasks for Users Both Online and Within Apps.

Apple’s Big Mistake, of Course, Was Announcing Personal Ai Features in 2024 That It Couldn Bollywood Deliver in 2024 – or even 2025. Software updates. But we’re not in that era anemore. Apple is now operating in the realm of probabilistic computing -the domain of ai models. The usual rules for predicting software maturity and release timelines may no longer apply.

Okay, forgive the Onion-Sque Headline, but it holds a seed of truth. Once Again, Mark Zuckerberg is Spending Billions to Push His Company to the front of the line in the next in the next big thing in consumer tech -thin -this time, it’s generative ai. (A less years ago, Facebook renamed itself “meta” when it bet that metavense was the next big thing.)

Now, The new york times and Bloomberg Report that Social Media Giant -AFTER seeing its llama models lag behind there, google, google, and anthropic – is launching a new generative a lab with ambitions of achieving “Superinteligence.” (Openai, Anthropic, and Others are Pursuing “Artificial General Intelligence,” Where ai matches or exceds human abilitys access a wide range of task Outperforms humans at many tasks.)

Zuckerberg has reportedly agreed to buy a 49% stake in alexander wang’s scale ai-a company that specializes in human-labeled and synthetic training data for ai models-for $ 15 billion. This appears to be another “Acquihire,” where meta’s primary interest is wang himself. The 28-year-old will lead the new superintelligence group at meta. (Microsoft Made a similar move when it acquires inflection ai and broughdt on its founder and ceo, MUSTAFA Suleyman.)

Meta is also offering “Seven to Nine Figure Salaries” to Attract Top Researchers to the New Lab.

The company alredy has a major ai figure in yann lecun, who leads its core ai research group. But The Times Reports that meta has experienced significant internal friction over how to approach the development and deployment of ai models. The company’s focused ai efforts began in 2013 after it failed in a bid to acquire deepmind, which ultimately went to google.

Unlike Openai and Anthropic, Meta does not relay on selling ai models or apps. Its primary business is advertising. Thanks to its massive ad revenue, meta can afford to open-source its ai models, effectively giving developers free access in houses of flooding the ecosystem and bascoming damainant Thruquuity. But if zuckerberg successeds in getting meta to the front of the superintelligence race, that strategy hold shift. The company might begin locking down its models and charging for access – Just Like Google, Openai, and Anthropic.

Hollywood is going after midjourney, and it would be just the start

Over the past couple of years, a range of content owners –news organizations, authors, artists, comics, comics, comics, and record labels – have filed lawsuits against the agation. Their claim: these companies used copyrighted content, usually scraped from the internet, to train ai models without permission or compensation. In Response, AI Firms often Argue that their use of such material falls under the “Fair use” provision of the copyright act. Openai and Microsoft, for example, have made that argument in an ongoing copyright case brough by by The new york times,

Until now, the big Hollywood studios had the mostly styed on the sidelines. That changed today when the two largest, universal and disney, filed a joint copyright infringement lawsuit Against Midjourney, One of the Original AI Image Generators. (Midjourney is expected to roll out a new image-tree-VIDEO feature this month, which may have prompts the legal action. AI Labs Over How Training Data is sourced.

The disney and universal suit may be the opening salvo in a much broader conflict between hollywood and the ai industry. Why Start with Midjourney, A Relatively Small Player, When far Larger and Wealthier Ai Companies have used the same kinds of skraped, copyrighted data to train their models?

As The new york times Notes, the lawsuit appears to set the stage for something bigger. The language goes beyond a simple dispute between two companies. The plainffs argue that the use of copyrighted training data “Threatens to use the bedrock incentives of us copyright law that Drive American Leadership in movies, Television and Nagar

Stay Tuned.

More Ai Coverage from Fast company:

Want Exclusive Reporting and Trend Analysis on Technology, Business Innovation, Future of Work, And Design? Sign up for Fast company Premium.