Staking is a fundamental component of the Ethereum ecosystem, centered on the Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism, where users can earn rewards by contributing to network security. However, the increasing centralization of power in the hands of a few institutional entities has raised concerns about the risks posed to the decentralization and security of the Ethereum blockchain.
For this reason, integrating Distributed Validator Technology (DVT) into staking offers a more resilient and decentralized alternative, addressing the shortcomings of traditional centralized staking platforms. Below, we address some common questions related to Ethereum staking using DVT-based options that allow users to deploy or operate validators on the Beacon Chain. These platforms, such as SafeStake, Obol Labs, or SSV Network, make it easier for average users to become ETH stakers.
Why is it necessary to convert ETH into synthetic tokens or derivatives, such as sfETH, for staking? Why not stake directly with ETH?
The conversion from ETH to sfETH is a common practice on platforms that use derivative tokens to represent staked ETH. Tokens like stETH or rETH are examples of liquid staking tokens used by platforms such as Lido and Rocket Pool, designed to provide liquidity while users’ ETH was locked before the Shanghai Upgrade.
However, with recent Ethereum updates, staked ETH withdrawals are now enabled on the mainnet. This means users can stake directly with ETH and withdraw their funds whenever they wish.
That said, depending on the protocol, you may need 32 ETH to stake directly and deploy a validator. In cases like SafeStake, it is possible to participate with as little as 4 ETH run a type of Operators who provide liquidity to create a mini-pool called ‘initiators’ to help deploy a validator on the Beacon Chain.
Note: According to the SafeStake Whitepaper, in Stage 2, SafeStake will partner with LST protocols to run ‘Pooled Validators,’ empowering LST/LRT protocols to deploy validators on the SafeStake platform, enhancing security and improving performance resilience.
While decentralized, non-custodial options using DVT (e.g., SafeStake or SSV Network) are available, platforms like Lido Finance and Rocket Pool continue to offer derivative tokens like stETH for additional liquidity and flexibility within the DeFi ecosystem. These tokens allow users to engage in DeFi activities while their ETH is staked. However, users should be aware of associated risks, such as the potential for a value depeg between synthetic tokens and ETH.
How can I safely stake my ETH directly from a cold wallet?
While keeping private keys offline minimizes hacking risks, staking directly from a cold wallet may involve signing transactions. To initiate a validator, for example, you must sign a transaction to send the required funds (32 ETH) from your wallet to a smart contract.
If you lack the 32 ETH required for direct staking, protocols like RocketPool allow you to acquire rETH on a DEX and sign a transaction to delegate your ETH to a node operator. With SafeStake, you can also run a validator or node operator directly through the interface using Ledger Live.
Tips for secure staking from a cold wallet:
-
Choose a Reliable Staking Service: Use platforms that implement DVT, such as SafeStake, Obol Labs, or SSV Network, to decentralize validator responsibilities and minimize single points of failure.
-
Connect with Staking Services: Platforms like Lido Finance and RocketPool support staking (liquid staking) from cold wallets by integrating with wallets like Ledger or Trezor.
-
Validator Network Integration: Protocols with DVT allow users to connect cold wallets to decentralized validator infrastructures, reducing the risk of loss due to validator failures.
Platform Security Protocols: Look for staking platforms offering protection mechanisms, such as service-level agreements (SLAs) and validator monitoring, to prevent inactivity, penalties, or misconduct.
Is there a risk of depegging between ETH and synthetic tokens?
Using derivative tokens like stETH or rETH introduces the potential risk of depegging, where their value diverges from ETH. While these tokens are designed to closely track ETH’s value, market liquidity, demand, and specific events may cause temporary value fluctuations.
Platforms employing stETH often use algorithms to maintain a 1:1 parity with ETH. However, users should conduct proper research and remain aware of associated risks. For example, if a small depeg occurs, buying stETH during a dip and waiting for it to repeg could yield gains. Conversely, selling stETH during a depeg might result in minor losses.
What are the risks of losing funds when staking with DVT protocols?
Staking with a platform that utilizes DVT significantly reduces the risks compared to traditional staking methods. Key considerations include:
-
Distributed Validator Technology (DVT): Platforms like Obol spreads validator operations across multiple operators, minimizing risks of downtime or penalties for misconduct.
-
Protocol Risks: Although DVT has advantages, no system is entirely risk-free. Risks such as smart contract bugs or governance failures are mitigated through audits and community testing.
-
Validator Risks: DVT reduces reliance on individual validators, lowering the likelihood of significant failures.
-
Platform-Specific Security Measures: DVT-based platforms such as Safestake or SSV Network employ robust security features, such as insurance mechanisms and validator performance monitoring, to safeguard user funds.
How does DVT redefine the relationship between validators and node operators?
Distributed Validator Technology (DVT) introduces a more equitable, secure, and efficient model for validator-node operator collaboration:
- Redistribution of Responsibilities: DVT divides validator responsibilities among multiple operators, reducing individual workloads and fostering cooperation.
- Enhanced Security: Validator keys are split among operators, reducing risks from single points of failure.
- Encouragement of Specialisation: Operators can focus on optimizing their nodes, while validators delegate technical infrastructure.
- Aligned Incentives: Validator earnings are distributed proportionally among operators, motivating high performance.
- Increased Inclusion for Smaller Operators: DVT enables smaller operators to participate collectively, enhancing Ethereum’s decentralization.
What impact does DVT have on economic incentives for stakers and node operators?
DVT fosters a balanced incentive structure within Ethereum’s ecosystem:
- For Stakers: Small-scale stakers gain secure access to staking without operating full nodes, promoting decentralization and consistent rewards.
- For Node Operators: Participating in a DVT network ensures shared validator responsibilities and proportional rewards, encouraging high performance.
- Reduced Penalties: By distributing validator tasks, DVT mitigates catastrophic failures, resulting in fewer penalties and improved returns for participants.
How does DVT affect Ethereum’s decentralization?
DVT strengthens Ethereum’s decentralization, critical for censorship resistance and network security:
- Reducing Node Centralisation: DVT distributes responsibilities, minimizing reliance on large operators and fostering diversity.
- Increasing Community Participation: Smaller communities can establish validator groups, enhancing autonomy and decentralization.
- Enhancing Attack Resilience: Validator decentralization makes coordinated attacks more challenging.
What Challenges Does DVT Adoption Face in the Ethereum Ecosystem?
Despite its benefits, the adoption of DVT faces several challenges:
-
Technical Complexity: Implementing DVT requires advanced technical knowledge, which can be a barrier for non-technical stakers. However, more user-friendly solutions are being developed to mitigate this obstacle, such as SafeStake, which is currently in its Mainnet Private phase.
-
Infrastructure Compatibility: Another significant challenge lies in ensuring compatibility with existing infrastructures. Some staking services and nodes operate under traditional architectures that are not easily compatible with DVT, requiring substantial updates to adapt to this technology.
-
Awareness and Education: Finally, there is a need for greater outreach and education to drive mass adoption of DVT. As this technology is relatively new, many participants in the Ethereum ecosystem are unfamiliar with the benefits it offers.
Conclusion
The integration of Distributed Validator Technology (DVT) represents a fundamental advancement for Ethereum staking, offering enhanced levels of security, resilience, and decentralization. By empowering small-scale stakers and decentralizing the responsibilities of validator nodes, DVT addresses key concerns regarding centralization and censorship within the network.
As the technology matures, we are likely to witness increased adoption within the ecosystem, driven by innovations that simplify its use and lower initial costs. For stakers looking to participate securely and effectively in the Ethereum ecosystem, DVT is a solution
