The answer is not as systematic as you might think, and it depends above all … on the shape of a panel.
An obligation only in certain cases
Unlike a tenacious received idea, not all cycle paths are compulsory. The Highway Code specifies that only certain fittings are, and the distinction is based on vertical signaling.
When a cycle path is indicated by a blue round panel (type B22A), it is compulsory. In this case, the cyclist must imperatively use it, under penalty of ticket. This rule is posed by article R431-9 of the Highway Code, which stipulates: “When a track or a cycle band has been produced and is indicated by a specific signaling, its use can be made compulsory for cyclists.”
The fine in the event of non-compliance is 35 euros (lump sum), which can be reduced to 22 euros or increased to 75 euros.
Other tracks: recommended but optional
On the other hand, If the panel is square, even blue, it is a simple recommendation. The cyclist can then choose to take the cycle path … or not. This visual shade changes everything: round panel, obligation while square panel, option.
The same goes for ground arrangements not accompanied by vertical signaling, such as certain cycle strips painted on the roadway: Without a panel, no formal obligation applies.
Special tolerated cases
In practice, some cases may also justify that a cyclist avoids a track, however compulsory. This is particularly the case:
- of a degraded or dangerous development (nests-of-poule, obstacles, dead leaves, gravel),
- too wide a bike, like a cargo bike or a trailer, unsuitable for the width of the track,
- exceptional circumstances, such as dense circulation or reduced visibility.
On the other hand, sporting practice or the platoons do not officially fall into the exceptions provided for by the code, even if the tolerance may exist locally.
A poorly known rule … and little applied
In fact, few verbalizations are noted for this specific reason, in particular for lack of control. Most cyclists also ignore that the obligation is based solely on the shape of a panel, not on the simple existence of the track.
For local communities, the question remains also sensitive, because making a track compulsory assumes that it is perfectly secure, maintained, and continuous, which is far from systematic!
A cyclist is only required to borrow a cycle path if it is reported by a blue round panel. In all other cases, it is up to him to judge if he prefers the track … or the road. A framed, but essential freedom, especially since the quality of cycle infrastructure is still very uneven depending on the territories.
🟣 To not miss any news on the Geek newspaper, subscribe to Google News and on our WhatsApp. And if you love us, .
