A group of authors have accused Microsoft of Using Nearly 200,as Professionals and Technology Companies.
Kai Bird, Jia Telentino, Daniel Okient and Several Others Alleged that Microsoft Used Pirateed Digital Versions of Their Books to Teach Its Its Megatron Ai To Responds to Human Prompts. Their lawsuit, filled in new york federal court on time, is one of Several High-Stakes Cases Breough by Author, News Outlets and Other Copyright Holders Against Tech Companies Including Meta Platforms, Anthropic and Microsoft-Backed Openai Over Alleged Misuse of their Material in Ai Training.
The authors requested a court order blocking microsoft’s infringing and statutory damages of up to $ 150,000 for Each work that Microsoft Allegedly Misuned.
Generative Artificial Intelligence Products Like Megatron Produce Text, Music, Images and Videos in Response to Users’ Prompts. To create these models, software engineers amass enormous databases of media to program the ai to produce Similar output.
The writers alleged in the complaint that microsoft used a collection of Nearly 200,000 pirated books to train megatron, an ai product that gives text responses to user prompts. The complaint said microsoft used the pirated dataset to create a Mimics the syntax, voice, and themes of the copyrighted works on which it was trained ”.
Spokespeople for Microsoft did not immediatily respond to a request for comment on the lawsuit. An attorney for the authors declined to comment.
The complaint against Microsoft came a day after a California federal judge ruled that Anthropic made fair use under US copyright law of authors’ material to train its AI systems but may still be Liable for pirating their books. It was the first us decision on the legality of using copyrighted materials with permission for generative ai training. The day the Complaint Against Microsoft was filed, a california judge Ruled in favorite in a similar dispute over the use of copyrighted books used to train ited Ruling more to the plaintifs’ Poor arguments than the strength of the tech giant’s defense.
The legal fight over copyright and ai began only after the debut of chatgpt and encompasses several different types of media. The new york time has sued openai for copyright infringement on its archive of articles; Dow jones, Parent company of the wall street Journal and the new york post, have filed a similar suit against against perplexity ai. Major Record Labels have sued companies making ai-power required music generals. Photography Company Getty Images Has Filed Suit Against Stability Ai Over the Startup’s text-to-image product. Just last week, disney and nbc universal sued midjourney, which offers a popular ai image generator, for alleged mise of some of the world’s most Famous Movie and TV Characters.
Tech companies have argued that they make fair use of copyrighted material to create new, transformative content, and that being forcited to pay copyright Holders for his WORK HOWS AI Industry. Sam Altman, CEO of Openai, said that the creation of chatgpt would have been “impossible” without the use of copyrighted works.
