“Escrow” has been a security measure in traditional finances for a while, long before the appearance of cryptocurrencies and decentralized systems. The point was opposite to decentralization, indeed: escrow implies middlemen. A trusted third party, often a company, mediates between two strangers and keeps the funds involved in their trade safe until it’s complete. That same third party could solve disputes about the trade if they arise.
On the other hand, a decentralized escrow involves a platform that allows two parties to securely exchange assets without relying on a third-party intermediary like a bank or lawyer. Instead, it uses smart contracts—self-executing agreements on a distributed network—that hold funds until specific conditions are met. This reduces fraud risk and ensures fair transactions without trusting a central authority.
For example, in a peer-to-peer (P2P) sale, a buyer deposits funds into a
Centralized vs. Decentralized Escrow Services
Centralized escrow services offer convenience and structured dispute resolution but come with notable drawbacks. Since a company manages the funds, users must trust its security measures and policies. These services often charge significant fees (
Decentralized escrow removes intermediaries, reducing costs and increasing autonomy. Smart contracts automate transactions, ensuring that funds are only released when agreed-upon conditions are met. An important consideration is that those smart contracts aren’t controlled by a central party. They exist inside a distributed, open network that only takes small transaction fees for every contract. Their code is already done, and it often can’t be changed.
This system enhances security by eliminating the risk of an escrow provider mismanaging or freezing funds. Furthermore, decentralized escrow can be accessible worldwide, without restrictions based on location or bureaucracy. In cases where disputes require human intervention, digital arbitration can still be integrated, often at a lower cost than traditional legal services.
Now, despite its advantages, decentralized escrow has some challenges. Smart contracts require careful coding to prevent vulnerabilities (it’s important
Create a Contract with Arbitration
If a dispute arises, an arbiter steps in to review the evidence and make a final decision. This system ensures that transactions are safe, efficient, and not dependent on centralized authorities.
Users can browse arbiter profiles, check their experience and fees, and select one before finalizing a contract. Fees for arbiters typically range from 2% to 5% and are only charged if a dispute occurs. Additionally, a small fixed fee of 0.75% applies to all
Using
Featured Vector Image by stockgiu /