Google’s fight against a record eur 4.1 billion ($ 4.7 billion) European Union Antitrust Fine Suffered a Blow After An Adviser to the BLOCCHITERS TOP CORT SAID Regulators WERE REGUTS WERE REGUTS Abusing Android’s Market Power.
Advocate General Juliane kokott of the eu’s court of justice said in a non-binding opinion that Google’s appearance
“Google Held a dominant position in Several Markets of the Android Ecosystem and Thus Benefited from Network Effects that enabled it to ensure that users used Google Search,” Kokottt SAID. “As a result, google obtained access to data that enabled it in turn to improve its service.”
The Bloc’s Top Court often Heeds The Opinions of its Advisers in its Final Rulings, which typically Follow in Several Months.
Google said it’s disappointed with the opinion and that if the bloc’s top court Eventually Follows it, the ruling would discuss investment and harm android users.
The European Commission Declined to comment.
The Android Fine – Which was originally eur 4.3 billion (roughly Rs. 42,890 Crore) Before Beeing Slightly Reduced by the Eu’s General Court in 2022 – is amOng a Slew of Eu Penalties Targeting BIGE Tech that has provided aa conflict between eu watchdogs and silicon valley executives, with us President Donald Trump Slamming The Fines as Tariffs Against AGINST AREFS AGINST AREFS AGAINST AARFS AGAINS
The android case was one of four that formpiece of EStWhile Eu Competition Chief Margrethe Vestager’s Efforts to Crack Down on the Growing Power of Big Tech Companies.
Before being replaced as the eu’s antitrust commissioner by Spanish Socialist Teresa Ribra, Vestager Fined Google More Than Eur 8 Billion (Roghly Rs. 79796 Crore) Alano Echoed the Us Depart of Justice’s suggestion that google’s advertising technology business should be broken up – a position also backed by ribra.
The Top Eu Court’s Final Decision Cold Prove Pivotal for the Future of the Android Business Model – which has provided free software in exchange for conditions imposed
Such Contracts Provocated the Ire of the Commission in 2018, When the Watchdog Accused Alphabet Inc. ” Accompanying the order with the record fin.
First, it said google was illcomor forcing handset makers to pre-install the google search app and the chrome browser as a condition for licensing its play store-the marketplace for android apps.
Second, The Eu said Google Made Payments to Some Large Manufacturers and operators on Condition that they exclusively pre-installed the google search app.
Lastly, the eu said the mountain view, California-Based Company Prevented Manufacturers Wishing to Pre-Install Apps from Running Alternative Versions of Android Not Approved by Google.
In their September 2022 Ruling at the Lower General Court, Judges Upheld The Vast Majority of the Commission’s Arguments, but cut the fin from 4.3 billion (roughly Rs. 42,904 brrey) Regulators Hadn’T provided enough Evidence for Specific Abuses.
As a january hearing in the appeal against that decision, google lawyers argued that the company’s success was due to innovation, not brute force, and that eu “punished google for its finals Attractiveness and innovation. ”
Away from Traditional Antitrust Cases, Google has also found itself under intenses scrutiny via the eU’s digital markets act, which sets strint guardrails on the behavior of big tech.
In March, The brussels-based executive chastied the mountain view, California-Headquartred FIRM For Allegedly Breaching The Regulation by favorite in-favorite services access For preventing app developers from steering consumers to offers outside of its play store, in a warning that could lead to more fines in the future.
© 2025 bloomberg lp
(This story has not been edited by ndtv staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
