Can decentralized exchanges finally compete with centralized platforms in derivatives trading without building their own infrastructure from scratch?
TrebleSwap thinks so. The Base network DEX has integrated Perpetual Hub Ultra, a Layer-3 technology from Orbs that transforms exchanges into perpetual futures trading venues through plug-and-play infrastructure. The integration, announced November 11, 2025, represents a shift in how smaller DEXs access institutional-grade trading capabilities without the engineering burden typically required.
What Perpetual Hub Ultra Actually Does
Perpetual Hub Ultra functions as pre-built derivatives infrastructure. DEXs plug into the system and immediately gain access to hedging mechanisms, liquidation engines, oracle feeds, and trading interfaces without coding these components themselves.
The technology routes liquidity from multiple sources simultaneously. Traders execute orders that pull from on-chain liquidity pools and off-chain sources including Binance, creating deeper order books than most DEXs achieve alone. This addresses a problem that has plagued decentralized derivatives for years: insufficient liquidity leading to slippage and poor execution prices.
Orbs developed Perpetual Hub Ultra in collaboration with Symm.io, building on what the company calls Layer-3 infrastructure. Unlike Layer-2 solutions that primarily handle scaling, Layer-3 in Orbs’ framework handles specific application logic. The system executes complex trading operations that standard smart contracts cannot manage efficiently, including real-time risk calculations and cross-exchange hedging.
TrebleSwap’s Base Network Bet
TrebleSwap operates on Base, the Ethereum Layer-2 network launched by Coinbase in August 2023. The platform combines token swaps, concentrated liquidity pools, cross-chain bridges, and a token launchpad within a single interface.
Base network has attracted DEX builders because of low transaction costs and direct connection to Coinbase’s ecosystem. However, derivatives trading has remained underdeveloped on Base compared to networks like Arbitrum or Optimism, where GMX and other perpetuals protocols have established dominant positions.
TrebleSwap’s integration positions the platform to capture derivatives trading volume on Base without the multi-month development cycle competitors faced. The platform plans to add limit orders, fiat on-ramps, and what it describes as institutional-grade hooks in upcoming releases.
The Intent-Based Trading Model
Intent-based trading has gained traction in DeFi over the past 18 months. Rather than users manually routing trades across multiple liquidity sources, intent-based systems accept an order and automatically find optimal execution paths.
Protocols like UniswapX and CowSwap have demonstrated this model in spot trading. Perpetual Hub Ultra extends the concept to derivatives. A trader submits an intent to open a 10x leveraged position on ETH. The system routes that order across available liquidity, hedges the position through connected exchanges, and manages ongoing risk without user intervention.
This contrasts with traditional DEX derivatives where traders interact directly with automated market makers or order books, manually managing their own hedging strategies. The difference matters for capital efficiency. Intent-based systems can aggregate fragmented liquidity that would otherwise sit idle across multiple venues.
Infrastructure as Product Strategy
Orbs has deployed variations of Perpetual Hub across multiple protocols before the Ultra version. The company positions itself as infrastructure rather than competing directly with DEXs for trading volume.
This mirrors strategies used by protocols like Gelato Network, which provides automation infrastructure, or The Graph, which handles data indexing. Rather than building a consumer-facing exchange, these protocols sell picks and shovels to those who do.
Orbs operates through a Proof-of-Stake consensus with validators distributed globally. The network processes trading logic separately from the underlying blockchain where trades settle. This architecture allows Orbs to update trading features without requiring changes to base layer protocols like Ethereum or Base.
The company has previously launched dLIMIT for limit orders, dTWAP for time-weighted average price execution, and Liquidity Hub for aggregating DEX and CEX liquidity. Each functions as a modular component that protocols can integrate independently or in combination.
What This Means for DEX Competition
Centralized exchanges dominate derivatives trading. Binance, OKX, and Bybit collectively process over $100 billion in daily perpetual futures volume. Decentralized perpetuals handle roughly $3-5 billion daily across all protocols combined.
The gap exists partly because building derivatives infrastructure requires specialized engineering. Liquidation engines must operate reliably during high volatility. Oracle systems need manipulation resistance. Risk management demands real-time calculation across thousands of positions.
Most DEX teams lack resources to build these systems while also developing user interfaces, conducting security audits, managing liquidity, and handling regulatory considerations. Off-the-shelf infrastructure changes the calculation. A team can launch a derivatives platform in weeks rather than quarters.
However, this creates new dependencies. DEXs using Perpetual Hub Ultra rely on Orbs validators to process trading logic correctly. If Orbs experiences downtime or technical issues, all integrated platforms suffer. This centralizes risk differently than monolithic exchanges but does not eliminate it.
Market Implications and Risk Factors
The integration highlights a broader trend toward modular DeFi infrastructure. Rather than vertically integrated protocols controlling every component of their stack, newer platforms assemble capabilities from specialized providers. This could accelerate DEX development but may also lead to homogenization. If multiple platforms use identical infrastructure, differentiation becomes difficult. TrebleSwap competes with other Base DEXs on factors like user experience, token offerings, and marketing rather than fundamental trading technology.
Capital efficiency improvements through better liquidity routing could reduce the edge centralized exchanges maintain. However, regulatory clarity remains clearer for offshore centralized platforms than for fully decentralized alternatives. Most jurisdictions have not established clear frameworks for DeFi derivatives, creating ongoing legal uncertainty.
The integration between TrebleSwap and Orbs demonstrates that technical barriers to launching competitive derivatives platforms are falling. Whether that translates to meaningful volume capture from centralized exchanges depends on factors beyond technology, including regulatory developments, institutional adoption patterns, and whether users prioritize decentralization over the familiarity of established platforms.
Final Thoughts
The partnership between Orbs and TrebleSwap represents infrastructure maturation rather than innovation in trading mechanisms. Perpetual futures have existed in DeFi since 2020, but deployment complexity restricted them to well-funded protocols. Democratizing access to these capabilities could fragment the market or allow niche DEXs to compete in specific verticals.
The risk lies in dependency. Protocols adopting turnkey infrastructure sacrifice control over core functionality. If Orbs changes fee structures, alters performance characteristics, or experiences security incidents, integrated DEXs have limited recourse. This differs from traditional infrastructure choices, a DEX switching from one RPC provider to another is straightforward, but replacing an entire derivatives stack post-launch requires rebuilding the product.
Base network selection is pragmatic. The ecosystem needs derivatives options, and first movers gain advantage. However, Coinbase’s control over Base introduces centralization that contradicts DeFi principles some users prioritize. TrebleSwap is betting that Base’s user base cares more about low fees and Coinbase integration than about maximizing decentralization.
The intent-based trading model works well when liquidity exists to fulfill intents. In low-volume conditions or during market stress, the system’s advantages diminish. How Perpetual Hub Ultra performs during a flash crash or exchange outage will determine whether it genuinely competes with centralized alternatives or simply works adequately during normal conditions.
Don’t forget to like and share the story!
:::tip
This author is an independent contributor publishing via our business blogging program. HackerNoon has reviewed the report for quality, but the claims herein belong to the author. #DYO
:::
