Matting Robustness: MaGGIe Performance Across Varying Mask Qualities | HackerNoon

Table of Links

Abstract and 1. Introduction

2. Related Works

3. MaGGIe

   3.1. Efficient Masked Guided Instance Matting

   3.2. Feature-Matte Temporal Consistency

4. Instance Matting Datasets

   4.1. Image Instance Matting and 4.2. Video Instance Matting

5. Experiments

   5.1. Pre-training on image data

   5.2. Training on video data

6. Discussion and References

Supplementary Material

7. Architecture details

8. Image matting

   8.1. Dataset generation and preparation

   8.2. Training details

   8.3. Quantitative details

   8.4. More qualitative results on natural images

9. Video matting

   9.1. Dataset generation

   9.2. Training details

   9.3. Quantitative details

   9.4. More qualitative results

8.3. Quantitative details

We extend the ablation study from the main paper, providing detailed statistics in Table 9 and Table 10. These tables offer insights into the average and standard deviation of performance metrics across HIM2K [49] and M-HIM2K datasets. Our model not only achieves competitive average results but also maintains low variability in performance across different error metrics. Additionally, we include the Sum Absolute Difference (SAD) metric, aligning with previous image matting benchmarks.

Comprehensive quantitative results comparing our model with baseline methods on HIM2K and M-HIM2K are presented in Table 12. This analysis highlights the impact of mask quality on matting output, with our model demonstrating consistent performance even with varying mask inputs.

We also perform another experiment when the MGMstyle refinement replaces our proposed sparse guided progressive refinement. The Table 11 shows the results where our proposed method outperforms the previous approach in all metrics.

:::info
Authors:

(1) Chuong Huynh, University of Maryland, College Park ([email protected]);

(2) Seoung Wug Oh, Adobe Research (seoh,[email protected]);

(3) Abhinav Shrivastava, University of Maryland, College Park ([email protected]);

(4) Joon-Young Lee, Adobe Research ([email protected]).

:::

:::info
This paper is available on arxiv under CC by 4.0 Deed (Attribution 4.0 International) license.

:::