The UK government’s secret demand for Apple to create backdoor access to encrypted user data was far broader than previously known, reports the Financial Times. British officials didn’t just want to break Apple’s Advanced Data Protection feature, but sought to tap a swathe of standard iCloud services used by millions worldwide.
New court filings published on Wednesday by the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPC) show the Home Office’s technical capability notice (TCN) “is not limited to” Apple’s Advanced Data Protection feature, reports the FT. The order also included requirements for Apple to “provide and maintain a capability to disclose categories of data stored within a cloud-based backup service,” suggesting the UK wanted access to backed-up messages and passwords.
Perhaps most significantly, the court document states that “the obligations included in the TCN are not limited to the UK or users of the service in the UK; they apply globally in respect of the relevant data categories of all iCloud users.”
The revelation comes after Trump administration officials claimed last week that the UK had agreed to drop its encryption demands following pressure from the U.S. director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and vice president JD Vance. However, the new filing suggests the Home Office has yet to formally modify or rescind its global data access demands.
Apple withdrew its Advanced Data Protection (ADP) feature from UK customers in February after receiving the secret government order, but the court documents imply this was only the tip of the iceberg. ADP provides end-to-end encryption for additional iCloud categories like Photos, Notes, and device backups, while standard iCloud already encrypts data in transit and at rest but allows Apple to access it with proper legal requests.
The case is arguably the most significant encryption battle since Apple’s 2016 fight with the FBI over unlocking the San Bernardino shooter’s iPhone. Apple has consistently maintained that creating backdoors would compromise security for all users and inevitably be exploited by malicious actors.
The IPC will hear Apple’s legal challenge in open court early next year, although the UK government refuses to confirm or deny the existence of the Home Office order. The court has agreed to proceed based on “assumed facts” to avoid participants violating the Official Secrets Act.
One person familiar with the case told FT they were “still very concerned this is still going on,” despite public statements from U.S. officials about the UK backing down.
Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.
