By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
World of SoftwareWorld of SoftwareWorld of Software
  • News
  • Software
  • Mobile
  • Computing
  • Gaming
  • Videos
  • More
    • Gadget
    • Web Stories
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Search
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Copyright © All Rights Reserved. World of Software.
Reading: Fortinet SSL VPNs Hit by Global Brute-Force Wave Before Attackers Shift to FortiManager
Share
Sign In
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
World of SoftwareWorld of Software
Font ResizerAa
  • Software
  • Mobile
  • Computing
  • Gadget
  • Gaming
  • Videos
Search
  • News
  • Software
  • Mobile
  • Computing
  • Gaming
  • Videos
  • More
    • Gadget
    • Web Stories
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Copyright © All Rights Reserved. World of Software.
World of Software > Computing > Fortinet SSL VPNs Hit by Global Brute-Force Wave Before Attackers Shift to FortiManager
Computing

Fortinet SSL VPNs Hit by Global Brute-Force Wave Before Attackers Shift to FortiManager

News Room
Last updated: 2025/08/12 at 1:49 PM
News Room Published 12 August 2025
Share
SHARE

Aug 12, 2025Ravie LakshmananThreat Intelligence / Enterprise Security

Cybersecurity researchers are warning of a “significant spike” in brute-force traffic aimed at Fortinet SSL VPN devices.

The coordinated activity, per threat intelligence firm GreyNoise, was observed on August 3, 2025, with over 780 unique IP addresses participating in the effort.

As many as 56 unique IP addresses have been detected over the past 24 hours. All the IP addresses have been classified as malicious, with the IPs originating from the United States, Canada, Russia, and the Netherlands. Targets of the brute-force activity include the United States, Hong Kong, Brazil, Spain, and Japan.

Cybersecurity

“Critically, the observed traffic was also targeting our FortiOS profile, suggesting deliberate and precise targeting of Fortinet’s SSL VPNs,” GreyNoise said. “This was not opportunistic — it was focused activity.”

The company also pointed out that it identified two distinct assault waves spotted before and after August 5: One, a long-running, brute-force activity tied to a single TCP signature that remained relatively steady over time, and Two, which involved a sudden and concentrated burst of traffic with a different TCP signature.

“While the August 3 traffic has targeted the FortiOS profile, traffic fingerprinted with TCP and client signatures – a meta signature – from August 5 onward was not hitting FortiOS,” the company noted. “Instead, it was consistently targeting our FortiManager.”

“This indicated a shift in attacker behavior – potentially the same infrastructure or toolset pivoting to a new Fortinet-facing service.”

On top of that, a deeper examination of the historical data associated with the post-August 5 TCP fingerprint has uncovered an earlier spike in June featuring a unique client signature that resolved to a FortiGate device in a residential ISP block managed by Pilot Fiber Inc.

Identity Security Risk Assessment

This has raised the possibility that the brute-force tooling was either initially tested or launched from a home network. An alternative hypothesis is the use of a residential proxy.

The development comes against the backdrop of findings that spikes in malicious activity are often followed by the disclosure of a new CVE affecting the same technology within six weeks.

“These patterns were exclusive to enterprise edge technologies like VPNs, firewalls, and remote access tools – the same kinds of systems increasingly targeted by advanced threat actors,” the company noted in its Early Warning Signals report published late last month.

The Hacker News has reached out to Fortinet for further comment, and we will update if we hear back.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Share
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Previous Article Chip changes could mean more A20 chip variants in 2026
Next Article Ultimate Ears’ Wonderboom 4 speaker is cheaper than ever at 40 percent off
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

248.1k Like
69.1k Follow
134k Pin
54.3k Follow

Latest News

Creating Customer Loyalty Programs with Influencer Marketing
Computing
The Anime “Subs vs. Dubs” War Explained
News
Baby lizard hatched at British zoo after extremely rare ‘virgin birth’
News
iPhone 17 vs Google Pixel 10: Specifications, Design, Cameras, Battery
Mobile

You Might also Like

Computing

Creating Customer Loyalty Programs with Influencer Marketing

3 Min Read
Computing

AI UX ≠ Classic UX: A Practical Guide for Designers | HackerNoon

8 Min Read
Computing

xf86-input-mouse 2.0.0 Released 12 Years After v1.9 Mouse Driver

1 Min Read
Computing

China’s Geely reportedly set to make and sell vehicles with Renault in Brazil · TechNode

1 Min Read
//

World of Software is your one-stop website for the latest tech news and updates, follow us now to get the news that matters to you.

Quick Link

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Topics

  • Computing
  • Software
  • Press Release
  • Trending

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

World of SoftwareWorld of Software
Follow US
Copyright © All Rights Reserved. World of Software.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?