Multinational corporations eyeing the digital landscape in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in February 2023 encountered a significant dilemma: commit to a multi-month effort to satisfy data sovereignty regulations or forgo the chance to participate in this growing market. As they sought ways to comply with the National Cybersecurity Authority’s intricate Class C certification requirements, which necessitated localized data storage, dedicated infrastructure, and rigorous access controls, independent software vendors (ISVs) saw potential earnings disappear.
The compliance burden was measurable. According to CITC’s 2023 Digital Transformation Report, Saudi Arabia’s digital economy was projected to contribute $50 billion to GDP by 2030, yet foreign cloud service providers struggled to meet regulatory thresholds that required customer data to remain within the Kingdom’s borders under strict oversight protocols. Each ISV attempting to serve Saudi customers needed separate infrastructure builds, legal reviews, and compliance audits before processing a single transaction.
Cloud platforms had begun offering regional data centers, but none had cracked the code on automating compliance itself. That gap left even established software companies facing four to eight-month deployment cycles and infrastructure costs that could reach hundreds of millions for enterprise-scale operations.
Building Compliance as a Service
Urvish Pandya approached the problem as an engineering challenge rather than a legal obstacle. Working as a Technical Program Leader at a major cloud provider, he started by translating Class C requirements from regulatory language into feature specifications. The National Cybersecurity Authority’s framework demanded granular access controls, audit trails for every data interaction, and automated systems to prevent unauthorized access across geographic boundaries.
“The existing model treats compliance as a checkbox exercise,” Urvish Pandya explains. “We needed to make it a native capability that developers could configure rather than construct from scratch.”
His team designed what became the only Class C certified offering from a major public cloud platform. The technical architecture separated customer journeys based on organizational structure. Multinational corporations received tools to manage cross-border data flows while maintaining Saudi residency for relevant workloads. Local Saudi companies and ISVs got a partner offering that let them build on certified infrastructure without maintaining separate compliance teams.
The differentiation ran deeper than customer segmentation. He coordinated across more than 60 backend services to create a data boundary solution, which also includes access justification workflows. When an engineer needed to troubleshoot a customer’s storage bucket, the system generated real-time audit logs, verified the access request against predefined policies, and either granted time-limited permissions or escalated to human review. The entire process took seconds instead of requiring manual ticket routing through legal departments.
Cutting Deployment Windows By 80 Percent
The quantifiable impact showed up in ISV adoption metrics. Software vendors that previously needed four to eight months to launch Saudi-compliant applications were completing deployments in one to two months. The 80 to 90 percent time reduction came from automating infrastructure provisioning, pre-configuring data residency controls, and embedding compliance checkpoints into standard developer workflows.
Cost savings extended beyond shortened timelines. ISVs avoided building redundant infrastructure for a single geographic market. For enterprise customers processing millions of transactions monthly, the infrastructure savings reached hundreds of millions in prevented capital expenditure. Industry-wide, delayed market entry had been costing billions annually in unrealized revenue as companies waited for compliant platforms.
Aramco and SAP became early adopters, using the certified platform to scale digital services without separate compliance builds. Startups gained the same access to Kingdom markets that previously required Fortune 500 legal budgets. The platform now serves over one million ISV providers reaching more than a billion cloud users globally, with the KSA-specific compliance tools providing a template for similar offerings in other regulated markets.
“We weren’t just solving for Saudi Arabia,” Urvish Pandya notes. “The architecture demonstrated that complex regulatory requirements could become composable services rather than one-off customizations.”
The technical implementation also strengthened operational trust between the US-based cloud infrastructure and Saudi technology oversight. By generating comprehensive audit logs for every data access request, the system gave regulators visibility into cross-border interactions without requiring manual reviews. That transparency helped establish technical alliance protocols that have since informed bilateral technology agreements.
The Global Compliance Model
Saudi Arabia’s data sovereignty push mirrors regulatory trends across Europe, Southeast Asia, and South America. The KSA project established a blueprint for turning jurisdiction-specific mandates into reusable compliance modules. Rather than building isolated solutions for each country, cloud providers can now offer a configurable governance platform that adapts to local requirements while maintaining consistent developer interfaces. The approach shifts compliance from a market entry barrier to a competitive advantage for platforms that automate the complexity.
For US ISVs, the practical benefit is access to emerging markets without maintaining separate legal entities or dedicated infrastructure in every jurisdiction, as this is software-defined data and access boundaries. The solution, including the automated access justification control that Urvish’s team built for Saudi Arabia, has been adapted for healthcare data in the US, financial services in Singapore, and government workloads requiring FedRAMP authorization. Each implementation reduces the time and cost threshold for regulated cloud computing.
The work also demonstrates how technical architecture can address geopolitical concerns around data sovereignty. By embedding oversight capabilities directly into infrastructure rather than relying on post-hoc audits, the model provides governments with confidence in foreign cloud platforms while preserving the economic benefits of global technology networks. That balance becomes increasingly relevant as nations weigh digital sovereignty against the practical limitations of building domestic cloud capacity from scratch.
Compliance automation represents the next phase of cloud infrastructure maturity. As regulatory complexity increases, platforms that treat governance as a core service rather than an add-on feature will capture market share in regions where data sovereignty shapes procurement decisions. The KSA implementation proved that automation could meet even the strictest regulatory standards while improving rather than impeding developer velocity. That combination positions compliance-as-code as a standard capability for global cloud infrastructure over the next decade.
:::tip
This story was distributed as a release by Sanya Kapoor under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program.
:::
