Asaf Wiener, CEO and Co-Founder, Mate Security.
Software development has fundamentally changed in the past 18 months. AI-assisted coding and engineering went from novel and exploratory to widely adopted across enterprise teams. We’re seeing it fundamentally reset core engineering domains, from code review and testing to deployment and documentation, by eliminating repetitive manual tasks and toil that traditionally consumed developer time.
Traditional software engineering follows a predictable sequence: plan, code, review, test, deploy, monitor. Each step requires human coordination, handoffs between team members and significant time investment in process management rather than actual problem-solving.
AI-native engineering breaks this linear model. Instead of sequential handoffs, we now have continuous human-AI collaboration loops that reduce coordination overhead while improving code quality and delivery speed.
How Engineering Teams Work Now
The traditional engineering workflow often revolved around coordination overhead: weekly planning meetings to align priorities, daily standups to surface blockers, code review sessions that could stretch for days and architecture discussions mixed with status updates. This framework worked when humans handled every aspect of the development pipeline.
The role of the software engineer is evolving from “person who writes code” to “person who orchestrates intelligent systems to solve business problems.” Engineers who thrive in AI-native environments have learned to think in terms of outcomes rather than implementation details.
The traditional engineer mindset is: “How do I implement this feature?” An AI-native engineer mindset is: “What business outcome am I trying to achieve, and what’s the optimal combination of human insight and AI execution to get there?”
The Before And After Reality
The transformation shows up in concrete metrics: 62% of teams in a recent study are quantifying productivity boosts at 25%. This isn’t just about efficiency; it represents fundamentally different coordination models. When AI agents handle pull request reviews, automatically update documentation and manage deployment pipelines, the traditional coordination layer becomes unnecessary.
Work becomes more agile and autonomous, optimizing for minimal meetings and synchronous coordination time. Status updates can happen automatically via AI-generated reports, allowing engineers to focus on creative problem-solving rather than administrative overhead.
The collaboration revolution extends beyond meetings into core engineering domains that traditionally created friction:
Code Review: From Bottleneck To Accelerator
Senior developers no longer spend hours combing through code for basic errors and style issues that used to create workflow bottlenecks. AI tools like GitHub Copilot and Qodo can handle mechanical tasks instantly. Human reviewers can now focus exclusively on strategic discussions around business logic, architecture and trade-offs, transforming reviews into collaborative design sessions rather than error-hunting exercises.
Testing: Unleashed
Manual testing that once dragged development cycles to a crawl has been replaced by AI-generated tests that cover edge cases humans typically miss. Agents on platforms like Tabnine and Amazon Q Developer can create and maintain comprehensive testing strategies, reducing production bugs without requiring additional engineering effort.
Documentation That Stays Current
The traditional problem of time-consuming documentation updates that were often neglected has disappeared. AI agents can monitor code changes and automatically keep documentation current. This transparency can shrink onboarding from months to weeks, improving new team member productivity and reducing the frustration of working with outdated information.
The New Development Cycle
I’ve noticed the traditional development cycle has been replaced by something entirely different:
• Previously a human would define the business problem and architectural constraints. Now an agent analyzes codebase and suggests multiple implementation approaches.
• Previously a human would select an approach and provide business context. Now an agent implements the solution, writes tests and generates documentation simultaneously.
• Previously a human would review for business logic alignment and strategic implications. Now an agent iterates based on feedback and manages the deployment pipeline.
The Challenges
Despite the benefits, AI-native engineering faces some real friction points. Like many novel technologies, the greatest challenge is often integration complexity, not innovation. Each AI platform operates with its own conventions and interfaces. This requires teams to invest time in building internal orchestration layers to bridge these differences and maintain shared context across agents.
Other common challenges include:
• Debugging Complexity: When issues arise, engineers must reverse-engineer AI decision making since generated code doesn’t always follow human logic patterns. Teams now require agents to document their reasoning through “decision logs” explaining architectural choices and trade-offs.
• Adaptation Struggles: Not every engineer adapts successfully. Some senior engineers struggle with reduced control as AI makes implementation decisions that humans traditionally owned. This can be particularly challenging for those who derive professional identity from technical mastery rather than business problem-solving.
• Quality Assurance Gaps: AI agents excel at execution but can miss nuanced business context or edge cases that require domain expertise. Human oversight remains critical at strategic checkpoints to ensure code quality and alignment with business requirements.
What Still Needs The Human Touch
Despite automation capabilities, certain aspects of software development remain distinctly human. Understanding how technical decisions impact user experience and business outcomes requires contextual judgment that goes beyond code. Architectural vision involves making strategic decisions about system design that will affect the codebase for years.
Creative problem-solving means approaching novel problems that don’t fit established patterns. Cross-team communication requires coordinating with product, design and business stakeholders who need human-to-human interaction. Risk assessment involves evaluating trade-offs that include business risk, technical debt and strategic implications.
These human-only domains are where many senior engineers now spend their time, and for many, it’s proving to be more engaging and impactful than the repetitive tasks that used to dominate their schedules.
The Competitive Reality
AI-native engineering teams have moved beyond the experimental phase. They’re shipping production systems, maintaining enterprise codebases and solving complex technical challenges using human-AI collaboration as their default operating model.
Features that once took weeks to design and build now ship in days. Onboarding drops from months to weeks, and engineers experience higher job satisfaction because they’re solving interesting problems instead of debugging syntax errors, writing boilerplate code or managing process overhead.
Leading companies are already embracing this transformation and restructuring their engineering organizations around human-AI collaboration. The revolution is happening now, whether traditional organizations are ready or not.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
