By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
World of SoftwareWorld of SoftwareWorld of Software
  • News
  • Software
  • Mobile
  • Computing
  • Gaming
  • Videos
  • More
    • Gadget
    • Web Stories
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Search
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Copyright © All Rights Reserved. World of Software.
Reading: The good, the bad, and the ugly sides of in-car tech you didn’t ask for
Share
Sign In
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
World of SoftwareWorld of Software
Font ResizerAa
  • Software
  • Mobile
  • Computing
  • Gadget
  • Gaming
  • Videos
Search
  • News
  • Software
  • Mobile
  • Computing
  • Gaming
  • Videos
  • More
    • Gadget
    • Web Stories
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Copyright © All Rights Reserved. World of Software.
World of Software > News > The good, the bad, and the ugly sides of in-car tech you didn’t ask for
News

The good, the bad, and the ugly sides of in-car tech you didn’t ask for

News Room
Last updated: 2025/09/27 at 1:51 PM
News Room Published 27 September 2025
Share
SHARE

Summary

  • Good tech works well: multi‑zone climate, blind‑spot cams, and smoother in‑car payments.
  • Good ideas are often badly executed. Things like car‑wash mode, biometrics, and attention monitors frustrate users.
  • Touch‑only controls are ugly — gear shifts and hidden indicators force you to look away.

The technology we use in our cars is a mixed bag. Some work exceptionally well, while others just look like great ideas — the experience of using them really sucks. Then there are features that can at best be described as ill-conceived, but more accurately, plain stupid.

And there isn’t always a clear line between what works and what does not. Advanced driver assist, for example, is brilliant when it works as advertised, but when it does not, the results can vary between terrifying and deadly.

Carmakers are always rushing new tech to market, driven by our collective craving for the next shiny toy. Some of that tech starts off rough but gets really good over time. Some still aren’t quite there. Others are just plain badly thought-out, with no real shot at redemption.

So here it is: the good, the bad, and the ugly of in-car tech.

The good

Good ideas really starting to work well

Credit: Apple

Some technologies promised a lot but failed to follow through. Either they were released too early — resulting in features that didn’t work properly or were frustrating to use — or some genius came along, looked at the feature, and found a much simpler, better way to do it.

Automatic multi-zone climate control

Automatic multi-zone climate control is a great idea, and it’s finally clicked into place for many car brands. It lets each person in the car travel with their ideal ambient temperature — basically a microclimate for every seat.

You can set the temperature and fan speed individually, and sensors will constantly monitor conditions and adjust as needed to keep things just right. It even works in three-row SUVs.

Blind-spot camera

Blind-spot alert uses a sensor in the bumper to warn you if you are about to change lane into a car in your blind spot. The blind spot camera takes it a step further with a camera on the passenger-side wing mirror. The moment you push the indicator stalk, the camera will show the view of the blind spot on your screen, with markings indicating scale and distances — much like your reverse parking camera.

According to J.D. Power’s TXI study, 93% of people with this feature use it most of the time, 74% want it when they next buy a car, and vehicles with this tech sell quicker than those without.

In-car payment

I used to hate this tech. It either didn’t work well, was a pain to use, or took so darn long that I’d rather just tap my card. Fortunately, it’s finally starting to do what it was supposed to. Over 60% of drivers now like it, using it for EV charging, fuel, parking, and tolls.

It’s still not a universal win — mostly because accessing it through the infotainment system is often clunky and overcomplicated. But it’s getting there.

The bad

Good ideas currently badly executed

A man wearing Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses with facial recognition lines on his face

Some ideas are so obviously good that we immediately get why we should have them. But then the execution is so bad, we just want to turn the feature off and go back to the old-school way of doing things. These are good ideas — and they could work really well — if the user experience gets a serious upgrade.

Car wash mode

This is a great idea — now so bad to use that I’ve had to invent new swear words just to express my frustration. We use a car wash because we’re in a hurry, so pressing a single button to close the windows and disable the rain-sensing wipers makes perfect sense.

Or it would — if you can find the button. It’s usually hidden deep within the layers of the infotainment system, making it difficult to find. Even if you find it, most systems are so slow, you may as well have saved some time by doing it manually. But with a bit of thought, this could be a feature I would like to have.

Biometric security verification

You know you’re you — and you’re in a hurry. But because of a bad hair day, your car doesn’t recognize your face and refuses to let you in. Or maybe your fingerprints don’t register because of a greasy finger. In an ideal world, your car would recognize you the moment you approach — unlock the doors, adjust your seat, and cue everything to your personal settings.

But unlike other tech that just isn’t quite there yet, biometric recognition is still very much hit-and-miss. The consequences of failure can vary from the annoying to really problematic.

Driver attention monitors

Driver attention monitors use sensors to track your face — especially your eyes — to make sure you’re paying attention to the road. Knowing what I know about drowsy driving, I fully support the idea. The problem is how it actually works.

It measures how well you stay in your lane, which means it’ll beep if you swerve to avoid a pothole or, say, a squashed animal. A camera tracks where your eyes are looking — and whether they’re open. So the system can get all excited when you glance at something next to the road, or you blink a lot because of hay fever.

The ugly

Awful ideas

Tesla Model S steering wheel with indicator arrows Credit: Tesla

Tesla is the most visible culprit in this, but it is by no means the only offender. A lot of these issues mirror the functionality of our phones, where everything is touch-based. The problem is that what works on phones does not necessarily translate into functional design on cars.

Designers like to replace messy levers, buttons, and stalks with icons on the touchscreen. After a day of driving a new car, your hands will instinctively drop to the gear lever to go from park to reverse.

Gear shift via touchscreen

It is simple. You simply tap the brake, and your gear shift function appears on the touchscreen. Which means you have to look down to see what you’re doing. Some carmakers swear by haptic buttons — the kind that vibrate when you touch them. But you still have to look down to find the damn things.

To add insult to injury, if your solution is to add two arrow buttons as an alternative gear selector behind the rearview mirror, your quest for futuristic minimalism has gone too far.

Indicators

In the quest to simplify the cabin, Tesla has removed the old, easy-to-find indicator stalks and replaced them with touch buttons on the screen and a couple of arrow buttons on the steering wheel.

When you are navigating your way at 50 mph through traffic, you want the old-school, ready-at-hand button, lever, or stalk, not some hidden button on an infotainment screen already too complicated for everyday use by busy people.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Share
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Previous Article Lawsuit over Apple Intelligence Siri delays is nitpicking, Apple argues
Next Article How to Run an Effective Level 10 Meeting |
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

248.1k Like
69.1k Follow
134k Pin
54.3k Follow

Latest News

Project Management Dashboard Examples & Templates |
Computing
Why NASA Picked An Air Force Pilot To Command Its Mars Simulation Mission – BGR
News
How a Hedge Fund Legend’s Unfinished Work Could Rewrite Your Trading Playbook
News
Why AI Won’t Replace Your Weather App (Yet) | HackerNoon
Computing

You Might also Like

News

Why NASA Picked An Air Force Pilot To Command Its Mars Simulation Mission – BGR

6 Min Read
News

How a Hedge Fund Legend’s Unfinished Work Could Rewrite Your Trading Playbook

12 Min Read
News

4 strategic reasons I’m waiting for the iPhone 18

9 Min Read
News

Not a typo! Starz is just $1/month to stream ‘Ballerina’ and more — how to get one of the best streaming deals of the year so far

5 Min Read
//

World of Software is your one-stop website for the latest tech news and updates, follow us now to get the news that matters to you.

Quick Link

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Topics

  • Computing
  • Software
  • Press Release
  • Trending

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

World of SoftwareWorld of Software
Follow US
Copyright © All Rights Reserved. World of Software.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?