By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
World of SoftwareWorld of SoftwareWorld of Software
  • News
  • Software
  • Mobile
  • Computing
  • Gaming
  • Videos
  • More
    • Gadget
    • Web Stories
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Search
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Copyright © All Rights Reserved. World of Software.
Reading: Understanding Parallelism and Performance in Databricks PySpark | HackerNoon
Share
Sign In
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
World of SoftwareWorld of Software
Font ResizerAa
  • Software
  • Mobile
  • Computing
  • Gadget
  • Gaming
  • Videos
Search
  • News
  • Software
  • Mobile
  • Computing
  • Gaming
  • Videos
  • More
    • Gadget
    • Web Stories
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Copyright © All Rights Reserved. World of Software.
World of Software > Computing > Understanding Parallelism and Performance in Databricks PySpark | HackerNoon
Computing

Understanding Parallelism and Performance in Databricks PySpark | HackerNoon

News Room
Last updated: 2025/10/14 at 5:44 PM
News Room Published 14 October 2025
Share
SHARE

When processing large datasets in Databricks using PySpark, performance depends heavily on how well your cluster resources are utilized — specifically, executors, cores, and partitions.

n In this blog, we’ll break down exactly how to calculate the number of parallel tasks, understand cluster behavior, and see a real-world example with performance observations.

Concept Overview

Before diving into the calculations, let’s understand the key Spark components:

| Term | Description |
|:—:|:—:|
| Executor | A JVM process launched on a worker node is responsible for running tasks. |
| Core | Each core represents a single thread of execution — 1 task runs per core. |
| Task | The smallest unit of work in Spark (usually processes one partition). |
| Parallelism | The number of tasks Spark can execute simultaneously. |
| Partition | Logical chunk of data Spark processes in parallel — one task per partition. |

In short:

More cores = more parallel tasks = faster processing (up to a point).

Example Cluster Configuration

| Parameter | Description | Value |
|:—:|:—:|:—:|
| Number of Worker Nodes | Total compute nodes (excluding the driver) | 10 |
| Executors per Node | Executors running on each node | 4 |
| CPU Cores per Executor | Number of CPU cores allocated per executor | 5 |
| Memory per Executor | Memory allocated per executor | 16 GB |

Step-by-Step Calculation

  1. Total Executors

    Total Executors = Nnode  x Eper_node

    = 10 x 4 = 40 executors

    Each of the 10 nodes runs 4 executors, giving 40 total executors.

  2. Total CPU Cores

    Total CPU Cores = Total Executors x Cper_executor

    = 40 x 5 = 200 cores

    That means your cluster can process 200 tasks in parallel.

  3. Number of Parallel Tasks

    In Spark, each task uses one CPU core:

    Parallel Tasks x Total CPU Cores = 200

    So 200 partitions can be processed at the same time.

Cluster Visualization

The diagram below shows the concept of executors, cores, and tasks in a simplified Databricks cluster

Data & File Example (Real-time Scenario)

Let’s assume we are processing a Parquet file stored in ADLS with the following details:

| Parameter | Description |
|:—:|:—:|
| File Format | Parquet |
| File Size | 100 GB |
| Number of Rows | 250 Million |
| Columns | 60 |
| Cluster Type | Databricks Standard (10-node cluster) |

Partition Calculation and Parallelism

By default, Spark creates partitions automatically. However, for large datasets, it’s better to define a target partition size — typically between 128 MB and 512 MB per partition.

Let’s calculate:

Number of Partitions = 100 GB ⁄256 MB = 102400 ⁄ 256 = 400 partitions

With 200 cores, Spark will process:

  • 200 tasks in the first wave
  • 200 tasks in the second wave

Total = 400 tasks processed in 2 waves

Performance Observation (Approximate)

| Stage | Description | Approx Time | Remarks |
|:—:|:—:|:—:|:—:|
| Stage 1 (Read & Filter) | Reading Parquet and applying filters | ~3 mins | Data is distributed evenly across executors. |
| Stage 2 (Transformations) | Joins and aggregations | ~5 mins | CPU-heavy but parallelized well due to 200 cores. |
| Stage 3 (Write Stage) | Writing output as Delta format | ~2 mins | Write parallelism depends on output partitions. |
| Total Job Runtime | — | ~10 mins | Efficient partitioning and balanced task distribution. |
| If only 50 partitions | — | ~25 mins | Underutilization — fewer tasks → idle cores. |
| If 2000 partitions | — | ~12–13 mins | Slight slowdown due to scheduling overhead. |

Performance Insights

| Configuration Change | Performance Impact |
|:—:|:—:|
| Increase executors or cores | Improves parallelism, reduces runtime |
| Too few partitions | CPU underutilized, slower |
| Too many small partitions | Task scheduling overhead increases |
| Balanced partitions (~256 MB each) | Best performance |
| Use Delta Format | Faster reads/writes with optimized layout |

Key Takeaways

  • Parallel Tasks = Total CPU Cores
  • 1 Task = 1 Partition = 1 Core
  • Tune partitions close to the number of available cores for best performance.
  • Monitor Spark UI → Stages tab to analyze task distribution and identify bottlenecks.
  • Don’t blindly increase partitions or cores — find the sweet spot for your workload.

Example Summary

| Metric | Value |
|:—:|:—:|
| Worker Nodes | 10 |
| Executors per Node | 4 |
| CPU Cores per Executor | 5 |
| Total Executors | 40 |
| Total CPU Cores / Parallel Tasks | 200 |
| Input File Size | 100 GB |
| Row Count | 250 Million |
| Partitions | 400 |
| Execution Waves | 2 |
| Approx Runtime | ~10 minutes |

Final Thoughts

This real-time breakdown shows how cluster configuration, task parallelism, and partition strategy directly impact Spark job runtime.

n Whether you’re optimizing ETL pipelines or tuning Delta writes —understanding these fundamentals can drastically improve Databricks performance and cost efficiency.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Share
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Previous Article Get Word, Excel, and PowerPoint without a subscription for only $40
Next Article Facebook removes ICE-tracking page after US government ‘outreach’
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

248.1k Like
69.1k Follow
134k Pin
54.3k Follow

Latest News

Breaking Down Silos with Composable Marketing
Computing
The Best Smart Home Gifts for the Holidays 2025
News
How Long Should a LinkedIn Post Be? The Complete Guide
Computing
SpaceX Offers New Look at V3 Starlink Satellite for Gigabit Speeds
News

You Might also Like

Computing

Breaking Down Silos with Composable Marketing

13 Min Read
Computing

How Long Should a LinkedIn Post Be? The Complete Guide

11 Min Read
Computing

👨🏿‍🚀 Daily – MultiChoice fades to French |

2 Min Read
Computing

What Happens When You Change the “Temperature” of Your AI? | HackerNoon

0 Min Read
//

World of Software is your one-stop website for the latest tech news and updates, follow us now to get the news that matters to you.

Quick Link

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Topics

  • Computing
  • Software
  • Press Release
  • Trending

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

World of SoftwareWorld of Software
Follow US
Copyright © All Rights Reserved. World of Software.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?