By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
World of SoftwareWorld of SoftwareWorld of Software
  • News
  • Software
  • Mobile
  • Computing
  • Gaming
  • Videos
  • More
    • Gadget
    • Web Stories
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Search
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Copyright © All Rights Reserved. World of Software.
Reading: Current RISC-V CPUs Being Too Slow Causes Headaches For Fedora: ~5x Slower Builds
Share
Sign In
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
World of SoftwareWorld of Software
Font ResizerAa
  • Software
  • Mobile
  • Computing
  • Gadget
  • Gaming
  • Videos
Search
  • News
  • Software
  • Mobile
  • Computing
  • Gaming
  • Videos
  • More
    • Gadget
    • Web Stories
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Copyright © All Rights Reserved. World of Software.
World of Software > Computing > Current RISC-V CPUs Being Too Slow Causes Headaches For Fedora: ~5x Slower Builds
Computing

Current RISC-V CPUs Being Too Slow Causes Headaches For Fedora: ~5x Slower Builds

News Room
Last updated: 2026/03/10 at 4:07 PM
News Room Published 10 March 2026
Share
Current RISC-V CPUs Being Too Slow Causes Headaches For Fedora: ~5x Slower Builds
SHARE

The current crop of RISC-V SoCs are still much slower than alternative CPU architectures and lead to much longer build times for Fedora packages as a result. There’s hope with next-gen RISC-V processors being faster but for now even compiling Binutils as an example is around five times slower than x86_64 — and that’s with disabling compiler link-time optimizations (LTO) for RISC-V to avoid an even longer build process.

Marcin Juszkiewicz of Red Hat who has long specialized in ARM64 Linux has been working on RISC-V package builds for Fedora Linux. His latest blog post on the subject today is entitled “RISC-V is sloooow“.

SiFive RISC-V boards

RISC-V package build times for Linux results in “terrible build times” with GNU Binutils build times used as an example. Compiling Binutils on x86_64 with eight cores is around 29 minutes, with LTO optimizations included, where as building Binutils on RISC-V without LTO is around 143 minutes — and that’s without LTO. The next slowest architecture for building Binutils was POWER PPC64LE at 46 minutes. AArch64 meanwhile came in at 36 minutes and i686 was the fastest at 25 minutes.

Juszkiewicz commented in his blog:

“The UltraRISC UR-DP1000 SoC, present on the Milk-V Titan motherboard should improve situation a bit (and can have 64 GB ram). Similar with SpacemiT K3-based systems (but only 32 GB ram). Both will be an improvement, but not the final solution.

We need hardware capable of building above “binutils” package below one hour. With LTO enabled system-wide etc. And it needs to be rackable and manageable like any other boring server. Without it, we can not even plan for the RISC-V 64-bit architecture to became one of official, primary architectures in Fedora Linux.”

With current RISC-V SoCs being so slow, QEMU is leveraged to help compensate for the slow hardware. Using 80 emulated RISC-V cores can compile LLVM under QEMU in about four hours compared to more than ten hours on a Banana Pi BPI-F3 builder.

Marcin’s blog post concludes with:

“We plan to start building Fedora Linux 44. If things go well, we will use the same kernel image on all of our builders (the current ones use a mix of kernel versions). LTO will still be disabled.

When it comes to lack of speed… There are plans to bring new, faster builders. And probably assign some heavier packages to them.”

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Share
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Previous Article Cruz questions full Anthropic ban: 'I have not seen a basis laid out' Cruz questions full Anthropic ban: 'I have not seen a basis laid out'
Next Article The 8 Best Budget Smartphones For Frequent Travelers – BGR The 8 Best Budget Smartphones For Frequent Travelers – BGR
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

248.1k Like
69.1k Follow
134k Pin
54.3k Follow

Latest News

Influencer Marketing for Enterprise: How to Scale Success
Influencer Marketing for Enterprise: How to Scale Success
Computing
An automated moderation error left Tumblr users panicked
An automated moderation error left Tumblr users panicked
News
This  Monitor Can Change The Way You Work And Game – BGR
This $50 Monitor Can Change The Way You Work And Game – BGR
News
iOS 26.4: Top 10 New Features Coming to Your iPhone
iOS 26.4: Top 10 New Features Coming to Your iPhone
News

You Might also Like

Influencer Marketing for Enterprise: How to Scale Success
Computing

Influencer Marketing for Enterprise: How to Scale Success

4 Min Read
360 launches Nano Search, redefining search engines with AI integration · TechNode
Computing

360 launches Nano Search, redefining search engines with AI integration · TechNode

1 Min Read
Social Media Analytics: What You Need to Know in 2025
Computing

Social Media Analytics: What You Need to Know in 2025

4 Min Read
Wine 11.5 Release Is Big: Syscall User Dispatch Feature Supported On Linux
Computing

Wine 11.5 Release Is Big: Syscall User Dispatch Feature Supported On Linux

2 Min Read
//

World of Software is your one-stop website for the latest tech news and updates, follow us now to get the news that matters to you.

Quick Link

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Topics

  • Computing
  • Software
  • Press Release
  • Trending

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

World of SoftwareWorld of Software
Follow US
Copyright © All Rights Reserved. World of Software.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?